Alles anzeigen »

2Std.	Alliance High Elves as a Playable Race
4Std.	Mythic Dungeon Invitational: Watch the Asia-Pacific Group Stage April 20–21!
6Std.	Did Discord destroy guild raiding?
6Std.	Feedback: Island Expeditions
9Std.	Have you ever tried a WoW weapon type irl ?

10Std.	Ulduar Transmog for DH
14Std.	Experimental Potion: Test Subjects Needed
14Std.	Fight, Kill, Salute
14Std.	The chosen ToV
1Tg.	When will Anduin start riding Wrathion?

Neuste News

Alles anzeigen »

19Min.	Mage Tower Now Active Again on NA Realms
1Std.	Blizzard Balance Gifting Now Available
3Std.	World of Warcraft Cooking with Lulaboo!
4Std.	Battle for Azeroth UI Updates - "Expansion Features" Achievements Category
11Std.	Liadrin's New Appearance in Battle for Azeroth

22Std.	Tribute to BlizzCon Costume Contest Winner Kazplay in Battle for Azeroth
1Tg.	Azerite Data for Build 26433 - Item Levels, Knowledge, Power Per Tier
1Tg.	Dark Iron Dwarf Mounts - Battle for Azeroth Mount Preview
1Tg.	Esports Blue Posts - Arena Esports in Australia, Skyline. D Wins China MDI
1Tg.	Battle for Azeroth Alpha Preview: In-game Communities

Ask the Devs #6: Guild Advancement

geposted 2011.04.27 um 12:23 von Ashelia

Notable topics include

Guild Leveling: Will Guild Challenges Help?

Abusive Guild Leaders

Will Guild Housing Become a Reality? (No)

Guild Experience

The guild perks system makes it unnaturally hard to start a new guild, since a guild without all perks is at an obvious disadvantage in recruitment. In addition, it rewards just recruiting random people (who might only care about the perks) to get guild XP. What are your thoughts on this? Will it be addressed?

We knew when we decided to add guild features for Cataclysm that this was one of the risks. If the guild perks and rewards aren't interesting, then there is no motivation to join a guild or work to improve your guild. On the other hand if they are too powerful, then you feel shackled to your old guild, even if it's not a healthy relationship for you. We were careful to only choose perks that didn't contribute to player power, and we let you keep any rewards you earn if you ever have to leave your guild. The perks are nice, no doubt, but you're going to have less fun in an established guild of jerks than you would starting your own guild with fewer perks.

We don't think recruiting random people is healthy for a guild. Rewards are never going to be a substitute for strong social ties. We really encourage as many people as possible to seek out guilds (and we hope the new Guild Finder will help with that), but joining a guild at random will likely end in tears.

On the other hand, there may be some benefit to having less churn on starting guilds. Before Cataclysm, some guilds would get started halfheartedly and then crumble again after a few weeks or months. Maintaining an active guild asks a lot of the guild master and leading officers. If you join an established guild in Cataclysm, hopefully it will continue to be around for awhile. But because of reputation, even brand new guilds may seem like a more serious option than they were before Cataclysm, since the founders of the guild know that anyone interested is likely looking for a long-term home and are not just hopping from guild to guild.

Leveling guild speed varies depending on the amount of players. Have you considered tweaking the system so that guilds with fewer members get more experience per player and bigger guilds get less to even it out? Are there plans to allow smaller guilds to level their guild faster?

Guild Challenges coming in patch 4.1 are designed to help address this issue. Obviously we already enforce a cap on the amount of XP that can be gained per day to keep the disparity from being too large, but it’s clear that smaller guilds still need some help. We'll monitor the impact of Guild Challenges and see if any further changes need to be made.

Are you planning to address the issue of Guild Leaders mass kicking members, once the guild reaches level 25?

We don't really have any interest in controlling who a guild leader chooses to kick, or when. Guilds are fairly transparent and simple player-run groups, and we have to be extremely careful about what systems we implement that impact how people can operate their guilds. We could absolutely make it more difficult for guild leaders to kick their members, and that might help very slightly with these situations, but the result would actually be that guild leaders would just be much less likely to invite new members. We want people to be in guilds, as opposed to making guild masters afraid that if they invite someone they may never be able to kick them if they don't work out.

Allowing players to keep some level of guild reputation is an option we can look into to help with this situation, though.

Is there any way to recover a guild which is deliberately disbanded by evil account hacker or lunatic guild leader?

The best way to deal with this situation is to immediately contact a World of Warcraft Game Master.

Are we going to see guild houses someday so we could finally get a special gather place for the guild, to meet and interact easily?

Guild housing is something we have discussed many times. It would be neat to have a place for people to hang out, but every time it has come up as a possibility we don't think that is worth the amount of time and resources it would take to implement (and do it right). This is one of those features where if we ever decided to do it, the benefit would have to outweigh other content we could be working on. Also, we don't feel that we need any new ways for players to hide themselves away. If possible we at least like people to be hanging around in the cities, if not out in the world. We know that many guilds, despite lack of official guild housing, have designated meeting locations throughout the world, which we think is really cool. If you don't have one yet it might be something to explore.

Why is guild experience capped daily instead of weekly?

We implemented a daily cap so that more players get a chance to contribute every day. A weekly cap would make this more difficult since a guild might hit the cap the first day, leaving no experience for the other members to gain over the remaining 6 days of the week. If you could only login on Thursday, and the cap was always already hit before you could log in, you might not be as interested in this whole guild progression thing.

However, we will be reducing the impact of the cap as we move though the Cataclysm patches. We will most likely start by increasing the daily cap, and removing it from more of the higher levels.

Why isn't guild XP from quests a factor of character level, quest difficulty, and intended quest level, instead of being derived directly from XP gained? Why is guild reputation so hard to gain before level 70? It feels as though it's harder to gain reputation with your guild at the beginning and easier as you gain levels; shouldn't it be the other way around?

The experience gained from a quest is directly related to all of these factors, which is why we use it as a basis to reward guild experience. Clearly this value is much smaller at lower levels and we know that this does not feel great with the current tuning. We're going to tune the XP multiplier for doing lower level quests so it doesn't feel like such a waste. Guild reputation suffers from this same multiplier issue too, and when we tune the experience the rep gain will be improved as well. Rep gain will also be much improved though in patch 4.1 with the introduction of the new guild tabards, and increased values on clearing dungeons, raids and winning arenas and battlegrounds.

It seems that the new guild system is killing off the Pick Up Group culture in KR. In KR, raids were generally done through PUG and players did not care what kind of guilds they joined for raids. Can we expect more localized guild features to support the unique raid culture of the Korean region?

We will continue to pay close attention to and work to protect the various in-game cultures in each region. However, we don't have plans to change the structure of the system at this time.

Are there any plans to allow for easier alt access to the same guild rewards as someone's main character? Perhaps some kind of +rep item that is BoA and can only be bought by an exalted character?

This is one of the main reasons 4.1 has new guild tabards with 50/100% bonus to rep. We made sure to place these at friendly and honored so they would be easy to obtain by alts. We are considering adding an even larger bonus to an exalted, BOA version as well. Great minds think alike!

Will there be additional levels of rewards for those guilds that have reached the cap in future patches? Are you going to add levels beyond 25?

Yes, we will continue to add rewards to the system as necessary. A great example is the guild reward we intend to add in patch 4.2 for guilds that obtain the new legendary staff. Guilds at level 25 also get the benefit of large gold deposits for completing Guild Challenges. Capping the guild system at level 25 felt right for the amount of content we wanted to provide in Cataclysm. We designed the system with expansions in mind, so raising the cap is something players will most likely see down the road.

Kommentare

Anmelden um Kommentar zu erstellen 13 Kommentare

Kommentar von Meggie Aw Meggie missed the boat.

- Why are only hierarchical structures supported? Kommentar von Nebet Meggie, what do you mean by that question? Kommentar von MOLDINAR so unless you were lucky enough to join a guild that the whole server joined , you are still boned . once again if your toons not in a cata zone you are still boned. o joy , a guild tabard will help ? what ever ! still dissapointed. Kommentar von Interest It seems that the new guild system is killing off the Pick Up Group culture in KR. In KR, raids were generally done through PUG and players did not care what kind of guilds they joined for raids. Can we expect more localized guild features to support the unique raid culture of the Korean region? –밥상의달인, Jeran, 블러드베인 Yes, we will continue to add rewards to the system as necessary. A great example is the guild reward we intend to add in patch 4.2 for guilds that obtain the new legendary staff. Guilds at level 25 also get the benefit of large gold deposits for completing Guild Challenges. Capping the guild system at level 25 felt right for the amount of content we wanted to provide in Cataclysm. We designed the system with expansions in mind, so raising the cap is something players will most likely see down the road.Kommentar von Rainemard We were careful to only choose perks that didn't contribute to player powerdoKommentar von Timanous We were careful to only choose perks that didn't contribute to player powerdoKommentar von lankybrit Sorry Ashelia - Hate the questions font.

Yuck.

Cheers. Kommentar von Rainemard And by all means, please list the perks that contribute to player power.
AufsitzenÜberholspurIm Namen der GerechtigkeitEhrenhafte ErwähnungAs seen hereKommentar von Ashelia Sorry Ashelia - Hate the questions font.

Yuck.

Cheers.Kommentar von Trollruler72 I actually like the layout and font.... Kommentar von Interest Sorry Ashelia - Hate the questions font.

Yuck.

Cheers.Kommentar von LoKHor Sorry Ashelia - Hate the questions font.

Yuck.

Cheers.Kommentar von Bruunpala I'm really enjoying the new Guild Features, but since I've been moving around since Cata, trying to find a spot in the sun, I haven't been able to enjoy everything, but with all the new stuff it seems I'll be catching up to my fellow guild members in a month or 2.

« Nächster Post

Vorheriger Post »

Ask the Devs #6: Guild Advancement

Ähnliche Beiträge

Kommentare

Schreibe einen Kommentar