Kommentare

Kommentar von Antilurker77

Only a +10 INT upgrade over the old gems? Even with gear having more gem slots, I thought getting full epic gems would be a bigger upgrade.

Kommentar von ViceVersa

Kommentar von JonathonWolf

Still not sure if it's worth it. The Brilliant Inferno Ruby goes for about 275g, while this one is currently going for about 9500g on the AH. That's an increase of 3450% for 10 INT points per socket. You'll be buying the older gems as placeholders until you can afford each one.

Kommentar von Rockeyyr

In almost full dragon soul gear i have 22 gems +1 meta. By the time im finished gearing i should have 25gems and with full epic gems an increased total of 235 INT (and 15 haste).

Kommentar von Ravenei

variable:itemId:enchantId:jewelId1:jewelId2:jewelId3:jewelId4:suffixId:uniqueId:linkLevel

This Gems JewelID is 4331

As a summary, this information is used to link enchanted and or gemmed items. Wowhead is unable to do this through their Comparison feature, yet.

ItemID: The Item ID (If you look at your current address it should say something along the lines of www.wowhead.com/item=______#comments. Whatever number you see in that ______ is the itemID. (Note: That is correct for gear-type items, the same is not said for Gem or Enchant IDs))

EnchantID: The Enchant ID (This is a bit more complicated and you will not be able to use the number given in wowheads adress, instead search the item none-the-less on wowhead and perhaps I will, or someone else will have posted the disired ID. If no one has, feel free to comment below requesting the ID and I'll add it as soon as possible.)

JewelID: The Jewel ID (The same circumstance applies to Jewel ID as to the Enchant ID, you can check to see if it's posted or attempt to find it via some scripts that I don't have on myself at the moment (they're rather complicated) and if no one has, feel free to comment and request it.)

SuffixeID: This is ignore-able and can, for simplicity's sake be kept at a value of 0.

UniqueID: This is ignore-able and can, for simplicity's sake be kept at a value of 0.

LinkLevel: This is ignore-able and can, for simplicity's sake be kept at a value of 0.

Item Name: The Item Name (Use the correct spelling as listed on Wowhead as even if you create the link with incorrect spelling, it's client side and will only look that way to you.)

In the end you end up with something similar to the following (this is the linking format you must use)
Note: So you don't look like a fool, don't link the finished code in chat with a space in front of it. You first need to use the script (i.e. Paste the script in chat with / at the very beginning of the chat frame.)

Format:
/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage("\124Variable\124Hitem:itemId:enchantId:jewelId1:jewelId2:jewelId3:jewelId4:suffixId:uniqueId:linkLevel\124h\124h\124r");

Steps:

Find the Page for the Desired Item on Wowhead.
Hit the Button next to (You'll be using this as your "format" so store it (Ctrl + C or Ctrl + X).)
Paste the code obtained from the button and type in the desired Enchant ID and JewelIDs into their appropriate places within the "format".

Finished

Completed Example:
/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage("\124cffff8000\124Hitem:71086:2193:4331:4331:4331:0:0:0:0\124h\124h\124r");

Kommentar von 1026806

The 4.3 Raw Epic Gems are not transmutable and ViceVersa's post should be edited to reflect this.

Kommentar von gr33nzo

Worth noting that for the purposes of maxing out your gear for Timewalking dungeons, this gem is not any better than Glänzender Purpurspinell, which is usually considerably easier (and cheaper) to buy and craft.

3D-Ansicht Links

Kurzübersicht

Screenshots

Videos

Glänzender Königinnengranat

Gegenstandsstufe 32
+6 Intelligenz

"Passt in jeden Sockel."

Maximaler Stapel: 200

Verkaufspreis: 90

Glänzender Königinnengranat

Weiteres

Beitragen