Does this even surprise anyone? It's impossible to kill a prot pally :P
omg he aggroing the critters and going carefully for them to keep up is the cutest thing ever
Prot Pallys are beasts man,
well 12 hours on atal'dazar ....rly mad (check realm time)
Pally's are soloing +10 and my 371 full toughness bear need very strong kite setup for every 10 and higher. Such a great gameplay mechanic's BFA have. angryface.jpg
This guy needs to be nerfed. Not Prot Pally in general... just this guy.
This guy needs to be nerfed. Not Prot Pally in general... just this guy.\r\rOr just ban him! Oh wait a sec...\r\r\rBut seriously, I'm torn between being impressed and feeling that this is just broken stuff.
Pally's are soloing +10 and my 371 full toughness bear need very strong kite setup for every 10 and higher. Such a great gameplay mechanic's BFA have. angryface.jpg\r\rPally's aren't soloing +10.... this guy did it, and it took him 3 and a half hours.
This guy needs to be nerfed. Not Prot Pally in general... just this guy.\r\rOr just ban him! Oh wait a sec...\r\r\rBut seriously, I'm torn between being impressed and feeling that this is just broken stuff.\r\rIt's isn't really "broken" it shouldn't work that way, but the set up time is sooooo long, that isn't a real problem for the game... there a LOT of other things that requiere real atention.
Finally Alliance better in PvE than Horde, good job.
Finally Alliance better in PvE than Horde, good job.\r\rThey were in legion aswell, its just that more play horde because thats where all the best guilds are.
Pally's are soloing +10 and my 371 full toughness bear need very strong kite setup for every 10 and higher. Such a great gameplay mechanic's BFA have. angryface.jpg\r\rPally's aren't soloing +10.... this guy did it, and it took him 3 and a half hours.\r\rif you count in time required for finding a competent group and failed attempts, 3.5h for +10 is not that bad.
Again, using critters, not mobs, isn't that "not intentional use" as Blizzard would define it? Or do you think they actually put critters in for us to use to solo +9 and +10 bosses?
Grats! \ud83d\udc4d \ud83d\udc4d\r\rAnd to see most of the pugs break apart 15 mins into a M+ run when there's one or 2 wipes.
All his videos are uploaded after he finds the exploit, reports the exploit and the exploit gets fixed.\r\rSo there is no harm whatsoever. He doesn't use the gear he gets so no harm no foul.
Pally's are soloing +10 and my 371 full toughness bear need very strong kite setup for every 10 and higher. Such a great gameplay mechanic's BFA have. angryface.jpg\r\rPally's aren't soloing +10.... this guy did it, and it took him 3 and a half hours.\r\rdidnt he say it still counts for your weekly chest thoguh?
They should ban him he is obviously abusing bugs\rand remove the gear he got through this abusing\r\rppl have been banned for abusing less bugs \rand he still isn't banned and his gear removed this makes me questioning blizz\r\ryes he reported it but so did toast in hs\rand he was banned and is not allowed to post videos on bugs that aren't fixed\ror he is perm banned again\r\rso why is rextroy allowed to do this and toast isn't?\rokay retroy is playing wow and toast hs but the company is the same\r\rin my optionin this is wrong same rules for everybody
I really wonder what kind of people are impressed by it.There is nothing extraordinary in his gameplay and literally everyone with a proper setup could have pulled that off. But why?His progression is @#$%, his raider.io is !@#$ and wowhead need to stop making "articles" about this guy.Meanwhile people are doing +18 in time already - this is a feat worth acknowledgement. Not this scrubs 3,5 hours long clown fiesta. Spamming judgement, AS and blessed hammer on CD while backpeddling. Such a skillfull gameplay...
They should ban him he is obviously abusing bugsand remove the gear he got through this abusingppl have been banned for abusing less bugs and he still isn't banned and his gear removed this makes me questioning blizzyes he reported it but so did toast in hsand he was banned and is not allowed to post videos on bugs that aren't fixedor he is perm banned againso why is rextroy allowed to do this and toast isn't?okay retroy is playing wow and toast hs but the company is the samein my optionin this is wrong same rules for everybodyHis videos are uploaded after he finds the exploit, reports it and gets fixed. If someone should get the axe is people getting paid for testing the game.
I really wonder what kind of people are impressed by it.\rThere is nothing extraordinary in his gameplay and literally everyone with a proper setup could have pulled that off. \rBut why?\rHis progression is @#$%, his raider.io is !@#$ and wowhead need to stop making "articles" about this guy.\rMeanwhile people are doing +18 in time already - this is a feat worth acknowledgement. Not this scrubs 3,5 hours long clown fiesta. \rSpamming judgement, AS and blessed hammer on CD while backpeddling. \rSuch a skillfull gameplay...\r\rI'm impressed by it, it takes time, dedication, preparation, patience, it's truly impressive even if he is "abusing" some mechanics. I don't understand such hatred toward something like that, he reports the bugs and the possible abuse that the devs should have seen coming, he doesn't keep the gear, and it shows us someone who really know how to play his character. Not everything, thankfully, in WOW is about doing the highest MM keys or MM raiding, there are other ways to show your skill, and I find this one great, just like every other players who manage to solo what appears to be at first unsoloable content.\r\rThere is an obsession about raider.io, it's not the alpha and omega of a player ability, and you can be a great player without clearing raids in mythic. Wowhead posting articles about this guy does not prevent them from also posting articles about clearing MM+18 keys, which is also, in its own way, a feat. This is about celebrating one of the many ways the game can be enjoyed, and also its limits.\r\rThis argument about "anyone could do it" is ridiculous, WELL THEN WHY DIDN'T YOU DO IT THEN ? (Sarcasm, obviously), no need to answer that btw.
Kommentare
Anmelden um Kommentar zu erstellen 31 Kommentare